End student surveillance

GoGuardian and similar "safety" systems don't work. In many cases, they pose much more of a risk to students than the websites they are designed to block.

Sign the petition

Blocking games and bypasses turns into a game of whack-a-mole

A new site can be spun up in five minutes or less by following a simple tutorial. Trying to black them all turns into a constant headache for IT that can be used doing much more productive things. GoGuardian uses AI to try to catch sites in advance, but it fails often and the system causes (anonymized) student data to be used to train their models. Automated alerts can also crowd email inboxes due to the high number of false positives. The EFF has created a quiz to see if people can guess what caused sites to get flagged, showing truly how bad it is.

Monitoring puts queer students at risk

Over 30%

Links in the latest Gender and Sexuality Alliance email are blocked.

All student activity

Can be monitored by parents through the GoGuardian parent app.

Many students

Have a school computer as their only device.

~50% of students

Do not share thoughts or ideas because they know what they do online may be monitored.

No proccess

Exists for requesting that a site be unblocked anonymously.

13% of students

At schools where montioring occurs know that a queer student has been outed by it. That number rises to 29% among LGBTQIA+ students.

Students oppose monitoring — and for good reason

73% of students have concern about monitoring in their schools. According to the Center for Democracy and Technology, "Black and Hispanic students reported being far more likely than white students to get into trouble because of online monitoring". Students with disabilities are also more likely to be concerned about monitoring than those who do not. False flags from these systems can also lead to police being sent to houses for simple misinterpretations. These systems also aren't cheap for taxpayers, as they can cost up to $60,000 per year. GoGuardian was purchased by the private equity firm Sumeru Equity Partners in 2018. To try to get districts to pay these prices, companies use many misleading statistics and claims in their marketing. The ACLU says that "for the EdTech Surveillance industry, 'an educated consumer is its worst customer.'"

"The [student surveillance technology] algorithms used by schools represent little more than bias in a box."

- Evan Enzer and Sarah Roth

Here's who else thinks this is a bad idea

From elected representatives to journalists to privacy advocates, it's hard to find an article from any mainstream source that is for student montioring.

Oppose mass surveillance

Ask schools and regulators to understand that filters:
  • Block essential educational resources
  • Often discriminate agaist minorities
  • Train AI on student browsing data
  • Allow admins to see device locations and screens
  • Risk student safety by allowing parents to surveil kids without them knowing
  • Do not stop kids from accessing blocked resources
  • Are deeply unpopular with students
  • Waste admins' time playing whack-a-mole
  • Can lead to SWATing over false alarms
  • Are opposed by privacy advocates around the world
Sign the petition We will never spam your email address